<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SourceGear Vault (a quick review)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.suver.com/blog/2003/07/16/sourcegear-vault-a-quick-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.suver.com/blog/2003/07/16/sourcegear-vault-a-quick-review/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 18:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: greg</title>
		<link>http://www.suver.com/blog/2003/07/16/sourcegear-vault-a-quick-review/#comment-236669</link>
		<dc:creator>greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 00:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.suver.com/blog/?p=105#comment-236669</guid>
		<description>if you have *large* repositories, you'll quickly find vault is slow as hell, unstable, and unreliable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if you have *large* repositories, you&#8217;ll quickly find vault is slow as hell, unstable, and unreliable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Homer Vs. Kidd :: SourceGear Vault, part Deux</title>
		<link>http://www.suver.com/blog/2003/07/16/sourcegear-vault-a-quick-review/#comment-154</link>
		<dc:creator>Homer Vs. Kidd :: SourceGear Vault, part Deux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2003 23:59:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.suver.com/blog/?p=105#comment-154</guid>
		<description>[...] 116;e&#64;suv&#101;&#114;.c&#111;m @ 10:59 am    A few months ago, I did a &lt;a href="http://www.suver.com/blog/index.php?p=105"&gt;quick review of Sourcegear Vault&lt;/a&gt;. Since then, we've upgraded from version 1.0.3 to 1.2.1.  The client t [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 116;e&#64;suv&#101;&#114;.c&#111;m @ 10:59 am    A few months ago, I did a <a href="http://www.suver.com/blog/index.php?p=105">quick review of Sourcegear Vault</a>. Since then, we&#8217;ve upgraded from version 1.0.3 to 1.2.1.  The client t [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nate</title>
		<link>http://www.suver.com/blog/2003/07/16/sourcegear-vault-a-quick-review/#comment-128</link>
		<dc:creator>nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2003 23:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.suver.com/blog/?p=105#comment-128</guid>
		<description>So far, the Vault server is about the best thing ever.  Fast, powerful, robust.  The Vault client?  Sucks ass.  Slow, clunky, missing some really basic tools.  Hopefully they remedy these problems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So far, the Vault server is about the best thing ever.  Fast, powerful, robust.  The Vault client?  Sucks ass.  Slow, clunky, missing some really basic tools.  Hopefully they remedy these problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
